|
|
Post by Reynard Camshir on Dec 2, 2014 17:44:26 GMT
Well if it's just yes or no, without caveats...
1. Yes
2. No
3. No
4. No
5. No
6. No
7. Yes
8. No
9. No
10. No
11. No
12. Yes
13. Yes
|
|
|
|
Post by Damon Nettles on Dec 2, 2014 18:35:15 GMT
1. No
2. Yes
3. Yes
4. No
5. No
6. No
7. Yes
8. No
9. No
10. No
11. No - disallow all non-charging use of lances instead; the weapon description on p. 130 makes the intended use of the lance clear - it's specifically a charging weapon
12. Yes - I've always read the rule this way anyway
13. Yes - if there ends up being a majority for applying some sort of restriction to Acrobatic Defense I could live with this
|
|
|
|
Post by Maester Haelis on Dec 2, 2014 18:37:18 GMT
1. No
2. Yes
3. No
4. No
5. No
6. Yes
7. Yes
8. Yes
9. No
10. No
11. Yes
12. Yes
13. No
|
|
|
|
Post by Roland Hite on Dec 3, 2014 21:23:20 GMT
1. Yes.
2. Yes.
3. Yes.
4. No.
5. No.
6. No.
7. No [they're great rules but might lead to combat dragging? I'm close to 50:50 on this if others keen]
8. Yes (but let people tweak characters)
9. No.
10. No.
11. Yes.
12. Yes.
13.Yes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ayleth Bartheld on Dec 3, 2014 21:32:41 GMT
1. Yes
2. Yes
3. Yes
4. No
5. No
6. No
7. Yes
8. No
9. Yes
10. Yes
11. Yes
12. Yes
13. No
|
|
|
|
Post by Symon Kytley on Dec 5, 2014 6:30:23 GMT
- Yes
- Yes
- Abstain
- Abstain
- Abstain
- No
- Yes, but instead of removing manipulate, I would just say don't apply the penalty for a mismatch resulting from manipulate
- No
- Abstain
- Yes
- Abstain
|
|
|
|
Post by Erryk Dulver on Dec 10, 2014 4:55:33 GMT
1. No
2. Yes
3. No
4. No
5. No
6. No
7. Yes
8. No
9. No
10. No
11. No
12. Yes
13. Yes
|
|
|
|
Post by Stranger on Dec 10, 2014 14:34:52 GMT
Just a quick reminder. I'll be tallying these votes on Saturday the 13th. If you haven't voted and want a say, your votes need to be in before then.
|
|
|
|
Post by Luke Seldon on Dec 10, 2014 15:21:07 GMT
1. No
2. Yes
3. No
4. No
5. No
6. No
7. No
8. No
9. No
10. No
11. No
12. Yes
13. Yes
Couldn't this be done as a poll?
|
|
|
|
Post by Stranger on Dec 14, 2014 20:37:34 GMT
I wish, it would have made this easier to do it as a poll. But it doesn't let me do yes and no votes for multiple items. The votes have been tallied with the following results:
1. Armor ratings will remain as they are in the book (this one was really close)
2. Advanced combat rules are now in use
3. Armor penalty will still apply to knockdown attempts (another close one)
4. Critical hit rules will not be implemented (practically unanimous)
5. Critical fumble rules will not be implemented (practically unanimous
6. Acrobatic defense can be used with bulk weapons (except shields, see #13)
7. Fatigue rules are now in use
8. Specialty dice will not be required in order to avoid the training penalty of shields when using other weapons to attack
9. There will be no -1D to tests when your technique does not suit your objective
10. Read Target still gives the +1D
11. Lances do not take a -2D if not used in conjunction with a charge
12. Training requirements (p 155) applies to bonus dice from specialties alone (so you calculate training penalty before taking into account any other bonus dice)
13. Acrobatic defense cannot be used with shields
|
|
It's set just before the historic Blacks v Greens period